đŸ§Ș Early Information on the June 2020 HOTM (Raffaele)

Has he been edited yet or is he still the same version he was before?

Raffaele hasn’t been in Beta for almost a month, so there are no updates since his last testing.

Dang. How unfortunate (imo).

1 Like

After I get nothing from Grimforest, I’ll need to apologize to Thorne for waiting so long.

1 Like

So from first to second iteration, there has been done a complete re-do of his concept. And while the new concept does not work at all, the fact that the devs are willing to go in another direction gives hope to this hero (for now).

Raffaele’s new concept does not work for a number of reasons:

So he is a Slow hero with Tank stats: 803def/1402hp, here below are some other heroes that are mostly used as tanks for comparasion:

Queen of H. 730/1545
Grazul 817/1405
Aegir 805/1446
C.Richard 862/1361
Heimdall 836/1402
M.North 819/1462
OPlluria 832/1425
Yunan 815/1437
C.Horgall 694/1669
Boss Wolf 826/1524
Kunchen 815/1437
Guardian Owl 795/1483
Guin 778/1347
Justice 775/1425

Looks to be average. Now the whole drawback of having a slow ult is, theoretically, compensated by the possibility to be a tank. And with his “Anyone that is below 50% hp gets top to 50% hp” ability, he can survive for a long time. A pretty good synergie, on paper.
Green stacks against him that arent able to combo 8+tiles will end up with a tank back to 50% hp and an aoe heal/cleanse. Now while this can look impressive, unfortunatly it’s not because:

1_Stacking green does not only gives you the opportunity to bust the tank but most green counters him on their own (with the dispel ability). So an attacker is not going out of his/her way to prepare for him in any particular way. Just bring 3 greens, one of them will most likely have a dispel already.

2_ Why even bother to stack green against him?. Raffaele’s main selling factor, for this iteration, is survivality. He will outlive all of your other heroes and be the last one to die, for sure. Because he is no threat, nobody is afraid of a passive ult like his. If Raffaele’s does 3 ults before I start doing mine, I dont care, 3 cleanses and some healing that will negate my previous tile dmg. No punishment factor, I can relax charge 2/3 ults from my heavy hitters and pick 1 non Raffaele hero at a time.

A tank’s job is to buy enough time for his/her team to start doing stuff, his second job is to be the first one on the team to die. He doesnt do the second part at all, because he will be ignored as he is not a threat and he barely helps on the first one (with his heals and cleanses, which btw the best he will clean is probably a hex effect from a sorcer or a bleed).
Sure some VF hero will do a dot on your team, and he will cleanse it but that is not really usefull. Because anyobdy that uses a VF ult, before a cleanse is for 2 reasons only: they already have a gem matchup to bring back the VF ult to 100% mana or there is a big possibility of killing something with it, before the cleanse comes one turn later.

3_Cleanse is a wonderful ability as long as it’s not on a SLOW/VS hero. The whole point of cleanse is to mitigate harfull effects, if you can’t afford to do it fast what’s the point in blocking the last 1/3 or 1/4 of the damage?. By that point is just a consolation prize ability and instead of an useful one.

Well, that’s for defense. On attack his elemental link can shine as ppl will be stacking 3+ blue heroes. But then the Defense against Special skills formula has some weird math behind. So if it says that 30% of a 900dmg attack is not 270blocked dmg. Is like 150 blocked dmg, so you may as well read this as:

And same issue as the Cleanse ability, it’s utility gets wasted on a Slow hero. By the time you have it ready to use, you are bound to have taken some ults from the enemy. So by that point, you are most likely slowing down the bleeding not preventing it.

I personaly, wouldn’t mind having the hero the same as it’s now but with an extra ability that brings down his ult speed by 1 “rank” every time he cast his ult that can not be dispelled (but it can be removed). So, he starts with SLOW after using his ult once he goes to AVERAGE speed. After doing it twice, he goes to FAST speed, and after the third one he stays at VF.
Now we have a very passive tank, that can still feel like a threat if I dont kill him fast. Which bring us back to our 2 point of “Being a good tank” (aka, dying first). He may not be the first one to die, as that spot is usually reserved for the most dangerous hero but he may end up being the second one to die. As having a VF cleanse, aoe healer that will bring ppl to 50% seems to be really annoying.

5 Likes

Juste make him a 5* star Kiril with a cleanse and a hot instead of the direct heal at average speed and it would be okay.

Don’t bother with the useless +50% Hp mecanichs if <50% no body cares about.

5 Likes

Super Kiril would be wonderful and would give us a healer worth chasing!

Yes. Super Kiril would be wonderful.

Long time player. First time discussion user.

3 Likes

I dont understand why this hero is constructed the way they are. Just having an initial heal+HoT+cleanse is not worthy of slow mana. Throw an additional buff or debuff in there and we are talking, but in this current form seems less than impressive.
Just bring one of 5 gazillion green dispellers.

3 Likes

Looking at this just thinking “wow, after the outrage about Telluria SG got scared enough to even nerf the unwhelming heroes pre-release”

If the HoT was reduced to 3 turns could make him annoying though
 Just imagine you almost killed that GM flank, Raffaele fires and 2 rounds later GM is almost back to full health. Maybe also add a +34% mana recovery for all allies and people would finally shut up about Telluria. :wink:

I suppose it would be too much to hope for a blue Ares with 25% less heal, the Clarissa treatment.

They are doing this because of Ariel. They don’t want another blue 5* healer to compete with Atlantis summons (whether it’s the actual portal or the players who already pulled her) so they are trying to make a “poor man’s” Ariel. A hero that couldn’t be compared/compete with her. That’s just my belief, but it’s the only rational explanation for this dumpster fire of a rollout.

4 Likes

That’s pretty wildly speculative to say with such conviction. They’re in the business of selling heroes, so making a bad hero, for any reason, is just bad business and hurts their bottom line. That doesn’t sound like a rational explanation to me. But an opinion? Sure.

To me, the hero card and the longer-than-normal list of revisions smells like them trying to create an innovative new card and just failing at figuring out how to balance it. I can’t recall the last time I’ve seen so many huge changes to a HOTM. They’ve held onto the unique mechanic of healing to 50%, which is sort of the core identity of this card, and then tried all kinds of things with it to create something that people will want but won’t be flamed for being OP.

Like any profitable company, I’m sure they have limits on how many revisions/ how much time they’ll spend trying to balance a hero before they just cut their losses and move on, which to me, is a more rational explanation for this dumpster fire.

5 Likes

“Attack: 650”

:thinking:

“Resist: Attack Ailments – This Hero has innate resistance against status ailments that affect Attack.”

:rofl::rofl::skull:

18 Likes

The money they make off of Valhalla more than makes up for the HotM which they actually don’t make much money off of since the HotM is often times complimentary. I pulled Malosi chasing after the wonderland heroes. I pulled Telluria chasing the first Valhalla portal. HotM are not designed to be better than event heroes, that’s why many of them aren’t.

2 Likes

To be honest I think they just need better game designers who have a good sense of balance and design.

You can have all the beta testers in the world but if the lead designer thinks he or she is good then that person’s say will overrule everything else. Subject to board approval

7 Likes

You have numbers on how much Valhalla earns compared to other things? You can’t treat your speculations as empirical fact.

Yes, HOTM can be nothing more than a “Bonus Pull” to some people. But you also can’t deny that a good HOTM entices people to pull more than they normally would. Once the buzz of Telluria was circulating I would bet anything that spending increased to try to snag her for full green tank war defenses. Additionally, plenty of people are hoarding gems for May to get Clarissa and passing on Malosi. So without a doubt, HOTM quality can dictate and drive spending behaviors.

5 Likes

That’s certainly a possibility. I definitely agree that the concepts should be coming out of the design department strong and balanced and not relying on beta testers to be the designers. It’s a little surprising how much they rely on this beta testing program for feedback.

1 Like

Balancing a game is incredibly hard. Like, super uber incredibly hard.

That said, I don’t think they’re depending on beta-testers for design. The most recent Clarissa nerf is proof of this; none of the beta testers asked for that.

I think they’re releasing different versions of heroes to beta-testers to gauge player reactions in order to learn of boundaries of what the general playerbase might be excited about, what they might reject with pitchforks or welcome with open arms;

They want to see exactly how far they can go in each direction in order to maximize short term and long term profit.

Rather than a simple “let’s let the beta-testers balance this hero”.

7 Likes

You’re seriously one of those? It’s blatantly obvious that events make them more money than a single HotM. If these event heroes are outshined by HotM, who would pull for the event heroes? I shouldn’t need empirical evidence to point out the obvious. We are all smart enough to recognize basic patterns, so don’t discredit my intelligence.

With that being said, Raffaelle is a 5* blue healer and a direct threat to Ariel’s existence. I’m not saying it’s a fact, and quite frankly I distinctly said it was my opinion, but my opinion is based off of market strategies. SG would never (intentionally) cut off their nose to spite their face. If they were that dumb, Neith would have cut the same amount of mana as Guinevere, but the reason she did not (and they gave her the blind ability) is because they didn’t want Guin to have the competition. Keep the HotM heroes less powerful than the event heroes (with some exceptions), that’s what this is always going to be about.

Again, it’s my opinion, but makes a whole lot of sense, right? Release a hero that’s good, but not better than one that’s harder to obtain and will earn more money.

1 Like