I won a match with shrub bear on my team, that must mean he is awesome too. If she were really good, you would be very quiet about it so she could be your secret weapon. Everyone, even many who are happy with her will admit that she could still use something else to make her good. She is ok, but brand new, featured cards should be better than ok when every other featured character can destroy entire teams. Im not even saying she needs to be that strong, but this is puny and pathetic for a featured card in the current meta.
No one will answer this question.
WILL IT RUIN THE BALANCE OF THE GAME IF THEY ADD A 20% HEAL TO ALL TEAMMATES EXCEPT HER?
Deleted, i donât even know if you are agreeing or not. If you think she is good, would it destroy the balance of the game to add a 20% heal to all allies except her? If it wouldnât destroy the games ballance, why not do it? No one is asking for her to hit a dozen characters with 200% damage like other featured characters do, a taunt or a 20% heal for allies is all we were even talking about.
Sorry if you were agreeing, i just couldnât tell.
Firstly we are not talking about individual wins but consistent performances.
This is my full raid history 15 wins 5 losses using her. 85% win record against many top teams. Cant think of too many heroes at 3/70 that would be able to pull that off
Secondly yes shrub is awesome even at 5* level. Felton is even better. The fact that you used shurb as an example kind od shows your inflexible approach to the game which is why you want your heroes OP.
Why in the world would i do that? Sharing how good she is doesnt make me any less effective in my gameplay
For better or worse im pretty passionate about this game and i always share when i find a hidden gem. Nothing worse then when you get a good hero and you dont play them because of some misguided negative feedback on the forum.
Thats a blatant lie and can br easily proved by scrolling up
She is much much better thab ok. I have a deep roster and she is easily one of my best and one of my.most fun to use heroes
It is the very thing that most people are against - buffing strong heroes. Buffs should ideally be saved for the heroes that really need it rather those that would be better with it (which is literally every hero in the game)
Ps - this is why shrub is so good at all levels. Still cant belireve you used him as an examplr of how you can win âeven with shrubâ
Bro, you just want to argue. Ive seen tons of people saying she needs something else. You need to scroll up, 5 of yall saying she is awesome doesnât mean everyone loves her. I love that you guys like her. Please keep that love in mind when you set up your defense.
Shrub bear does stink. He is the worst taunt character in the game. He isnât bad when you keep in mind that he is a 3*, but i donât see him on any teams in my meta. Do you see a ton of shrub bear in your raids? I bet you do love him though, he does nothing but taunt. You apparently love characters that donât do damage or help you win.
I do like good characters, as much as it costs to get a 5* to drop, they need to be better than this trash. I donât pull most featured cards because i have garbage luck, so when i canât get crazy strong cards no matter how much i spend, it does make me angry when a featured 5* does drop and she does no damage and her buffs are trash like this, yea it makes me angry. I typically wonât even summon in portals when they feature cards that stink like her, but covenant is the only way to get some cards like elementals, so i had to pull in it, and of course i get the garbage card that is a waste of space. I could find a way to use tenebrae easier than this stupid thing.
Even if this gameplay experience is valid (for you personally) based on different roster options that you have, or a small niche that is easily managed (which doesnât seem the case for this hero), or different focus for defensive heroes, or different raid strategies other than dragging matches out till the final minute.
Itâs still irrelevant.
Xiwangmu is not the ânew projectâ
âŚyou are!
Otherwise he would not quote you.
He would not reply to you.
He would just state the opposing view and move on.
This is why @Soulwarden was attacked first.
Verbiage like âtrashâ provides a reason to record videos all day long. Itâs the fuel for chasing after internet validation.
Then in the name of saving poor other players from their own rosters, even those that want a small stat buff will become ânew projectsâ
My advice:
Swallow the disappointmentâŚ
There will be more heroes that donât work well for you. You will certainly get those ones.
There will be more creeps that break the game. You probably wonât get those ones.
You can demand a buff, but what theyâll give
âŚis a costumeâŚ
In the meantime, save your breath.
Save your time.
Make do with what you got because the next portal will have something much stronger.
Who knows⌠maybe youâll getâŚ
âluckyâ
And stop caring about this hero that didnât fit your gameplay. By the way⌠if you play long enough⌠one day you stop caring about the heroes that do fit. Because they all get left behind by tomorrow portals anyway.
Exactly, I donât know why this particular hero has been given such a huge divide when sheâs not the first hero that has been like this. As I have said it before, this is SGâs game, theyâll buff their heroes however they like. And donât even expect the costume to be good either because of their recent track record
Moral of the story is, not all heroes are built to be the same. Why do you think they choose to buff the already strong construct heroes like gealach, brimstone and frond and leave out heroes that desperately needed a buff like tenebrae. They know, but they choose not to buff the needy ones.
The saying from Syndrome of âthe incrediblesâ goes along the lines of âwhen all heroes are special, no one isâ could be applied here. Which is why every portal needs to have at least a mok-arr/salmon/exeera/Set/ultrox, itâs to balance the quality of the heroes in the portal. If you draw these ânot so greatâ heroes, you are inclined to spend and spend again to get those other powerful heroes instead. They might be scummy, but they are certainly not fools.
So the only thing the average playerbase could do is to either adapt to the skills of the hero or move on to better heroes. Which is what the Pro-Xi movement is doing, making use of this heroâs skills to her fullest
This does not disregard the anti-xiâs feedback though. I see this divide as more of an argument between competitive and casual players. And the general concerns are justified as well. The fact that this hero gets this much traction from both sides also shows that this hero has potential to be great. Itâs just not realised.
But must this potential be realised, honestly not the playerbaseâs business to decide it. Only SG themselves can decide this
Because this card is garbage and it is frustrating hearing people pretend like this character couldnât use a small buff to make her useable for something. Some of us donât have every character, so it bothers us more when we finally get a 5* featured card to drop, and it is garbage, even when all the other featured cards are crazy strong, like luna, Sha Wujing, Shaal, Farah, etc. You guys are acting like a small buff would cause you physical pain.
To be clear, me and the other guy were talking about cool ways they should buff her when you guys started getting mad and insulting people. Why are you guys so eager to stop us from even talking about buffing her?
At least someone else sees sense, used her again today at 3:70 and she is literally just a +crit hero of which as @Jwyatt469 mentioned there are far better heroes for.
Oh, did you beat one in a match? Well you must be right if one is capable of losing one match. I guess shaal stinks and the old lady must be a titan in the meta. Ill go wait for the meta to figure it out, because im not seeing her anywhere on defenses.
