I know some people are sensitive.
I’ll try to be delicate
from what I can tell, the larger portion are those who…make do with what they have.
Not long ago we had a small portion that have all the heroes. I wonder if there are any of these folks left? Having all the heroes never meant being lazy or unimaginative. Folks like @JekylandHyde or @genuineness would use slow heroes where they shine best, and get to experiment in depth for synergies.
But when warring against enemies that have all the same defense, then…
You are playing against meta
.
And if using faster heroes like C.Panther to form synergies that give higher win rates than:
Against… META…
Then are those folks wrong?
Are their beliefs codswallop?
I don’t think so.
In fact…
I think it maybe important for this conversation. Look at the speed groups in the game:
We have:
Very Slow
Slow
Average
Fast
Very Fast
And a new speed group…
Instant
Which is what these passives represent.
Does this mean V.Slow heroes are garbage?
Of course it doesn’t.
Does competitive mean warring in the Top 10?
Never did… similarly,
Just because someone says they are disappointed with Myztero, doesn’t mean that person doesn’t know how to play. And certainly doesn’t mean that person doesn’t have valid reasons.
It simply means that some people find more success against Instant Meta Teams
with faster heroes
.
Being unable to read the writing on the wall with these new Instant heroes. And to see what’s coming down the pipe isn’t going to give the forum any respite from loud drums.
If a skill is instant,
Then it should NOT be so powerful…