In the other thread a couple of my stipulations got picked apart and then the thread got all nasty and locked before I could respond with why I wanted to do the picking of teams.
First reason was actually RNG, the swings that happen in RNG are too drastic when working with 11 fights. I didn’t want someone losing to 3 super strong teams in the first 3 fights just as much as I didn’t wantsomeone getting poorly hobbled teams the entire challenge and breezng (I use that term loosely) through it. I thought the way it was setup seemed pretty fair since there would be fights on both sides of the spectrum peppered through the entire challenge.
I also envisioned it to be a spectator event and the choices made by me and the challenger would add a bit of drama and make it interactive with the audience somewhat since they could throw their opinions around in chat while the decisions were being made.
The fact that the team was picked before the rolls began i suppose could’ve been removed but i wanted some type of chance still involved in the possible rolls. Like maybe the challenger was looking for his favorite team to fight but only had 5 rolls to fnd it or I was looking for the toughest possible team and had to settle for a not so tough team because time was running out.
I also wanted certain smack talkers that were in that thread to take the challenge because I know they were full of it, hence rule #1. Didn’t want to call anyone out by name since the personal attack clause in the forums can be called upon for damn near any reason.
Thanks for trying the neutered challenge though and i did get sent one video in line of my pal @Kamikaze_Assassin killing 17 in a row (unofficially) so I know he’s going to take me up on it and make me buy him gems eventually haha.