Stones' colour distribution is NOT random - MASTER Board Conspiracy

[Garanwyn]

What do you want me to say? You’re ignoring all the proof and analysis to the contrary that’s been posted.

Up thread is this actual counting of over 250 starting boards:

Stones' colour distribution is NOT random - MASTER Board Conspiracy

It seems so. The boards are fine, though. I’ve kept counting them like in my previous post. Stopped about a week ago and I’m not going to continue. Here’s what I have: Average number of tiles for 254 boards where I attacked with 5-colors: 7.08 R 6.92 G 7.14 B 7.02 P 6.84 Y Average number of tiles for 179 boards where I attacked with 3 Purple and 2 Blue: 7.13 R 6.84 G 6.88 B 6.99 P 7.15 Y Unlike you, though, I’ve made screenshots of every board, not just of those I didn’t like.

Here’s my post applying math to the question of how likely bad starting boards are:

Color Stacking: The Odds

There are a TON of posts complaining about how the game engine is somehow biased against those of us who color stack. I’ve seen lots of screen shots of 5 or 10 or 20 games, along with complaints that the engine can’t possibly be fair based on these (small) samples. What never seems to get talked about are the actual probabilities, and what we should really expect to happen when we color stack. Which is unfortunate, because the actual probabilities are really informative. Assuming that the gam…

The problem is, the “proofs” posted by those complaining of non-randomness never include a statistically meaningful sample. Just a handful of board pictures.

So, really, I’m not just using empty words. I’m summarizing actual analysis. If you have anything of comparable rigor to offer in support of your position, I would love to see it.