Wrong Advanced Stone Construction If Combining 6

@Rfm
You can never combine yourself more than 7 stones, this is we are talking about. Pushing (lifting) cascades does not give anything at all, correctly.
Btw. what is your problem getting a dragon skull more while combining 6 stones? Does it hurt you?

you’re the one who asked
I gave my opinion…

In cascade combining 5 stones or + give you a diamond…

1 Like

I would think you can’t use a stone (gem) in more than one construction so you’d get a diamond OR a dragon. The diamond is generally more useful.

Obviously not a bug etc but it would be neat if they introduced some more “special tiles”, wouldn’t it

Yes, I have sometimes made a double stack of 3 in a row (six in a rectangle?) which would be cool to get a bonus for.

1 Like

@Rfm
Correct.
If cascades creates valid combinations, they are valid revarded, not (fully) if you do it yourself. This is the bug, I mean.
Lifting cascades will not create crossed combinations like 4vs3, only in line. 7 in line is one diamond, that’s ok.

In your 4vs3 combo you are using 5 of them to make a diamond. What’s left is two gems, not 4.

1 Like

@nevarmaor
A possible explanation, should be confirmed by E&P, I guess.
5 in a hook (cross) a diamond, 4 in-line a dragon, according to my opinion.

@nevarmaor
If you play lotto in combination, you also get all revards even the numbers are “used”. We are talking about combination rewards.

In that case 5 in a row should be a diamond plus two dragons.

Edit: which I think is ridiculous.

That’s great in lotto, but this isn’t lotto. E&P was created to give you the highest possible special tile based on the amount of tiles used. Currently (and maybe always), this is the diamond tile.

Also, this isn’t a bug. This is the way it was made. I think you meant to put this in the Ideas And Features category instead of the Bugs & Issues category. This may be causing part of the confusion.

On another note… yes you can, but only in a cascade. You could technically get 7 tiles of the same color across and then several more going vertical and connecting to your 7.

1 Like

@LadySuzanne

As this game is based on chances we can surely talk about “lotto”.
My son made two draws at Epic and got “hero of the month” — great prize, isn’t it?
Yes, E&P works NOW, like this, it can be but changed, or not?
You tell, we get the highest possible reward and I tell they forgot the 4-in-line combination. Two meanings they are equal and not wrong.
Would you mind if E&P would made this change? If yes, why arguing against?
This I do not understand.
If I would suggest giving free gems for everyone, I’d surely earn “do not do it, this game is not made like this”. :sob::sob::sob:

With no cascade you can create more than 7 stones of the same colors. I mean in reality. Of course theoretically you can get four or five vertical stones hitting a hole in te first line, having 2 stones lefts and 2 rights of the same color.
Yeah, if you ever get it, run and buy a lotto immediately. :sweat_smile::sweat_smile::sweat_smile:

Just bear in mind I talked but about manual combination opening this thread.

Personally I don’t think we need the extra help of multiple combinations. The player on offence already has enough advantage. It’s working fine as is.

Plus it would make the Thanos challenge too easy.

2 Likes

I’d suggest if E&P would add this gift ever, they shall ask people about and do not implement them, they but do not want… :thinking::thinking::thinking:

Only for gamer they’d be HAPPY about.

A great compromise, I think. :sunglasses::sunglasses::sunglasses:

Not all mobile games are structured the same just as the lottery is not structured the same as other gambling games. Each have their differences. Just because one is structured in way, does not mean another game works the same.

They didn’t forget it - that’s the way they made it. This isn’t a bug but could be considered a feature change as I said here:

I’m not. I’m saying it’s in the wrong category. Again, what I said:

Regardless of how you opened the thread, a player mentioned getting more than 7 and you said it wasn’t possible. I was just agreeing that it could be done. Regardless, it doesn’t matter if you move the tiles or if it’s caused by a collapse as you still get the same outcome for a match of 5+ tiles.

@LadySuzanne

As I’m an IT professional (industry automation) I can tell you honestly, EVERY bug once put in program code “is made like this”. :grin:

If a 4-in-line combination creates a dragon stone, and you find examples where it doesn’t, you found a bug. Period.

More, I may underline it again, this discussion isn’t a discussion about me and I do not bother what YOU would do if you were me, because you are not me.
It is my thread and not yours. Any of your threads you can place wherever you want, don’t tell me please what I shall do, OK?

This is a discussion about a bug, where a 4-in-line stone construction does not gives a dragon stone.
Therefore it belongs to the place I put.

It’s a discussion about what YOU think is a bug. It is not a bug until SGG says it’s a bug. Just because you think that a gem should be used in multiple combinations does not make it so.

I also work in industrial automation. And no NOT EVERY bug “is made like this” if it damages something or injures someone.

1 Like

Unfortunately as has been highlighted by others that this is not a #bugs-issues as it is by design.

In E&P there are only 3 types of “Stones” that appear on the puzzle.

  • Normal Stones which populate the board
  • Dragon Stones (which explode when tapped/matched taking out nearby horizontal & vertical stones). Made by making a Match-4
  • Diamond Stones (which, when tapped/matched ‘use’ all stones of the same colour on the board). Made by making a Match-5+

If you would like to put forward a new type of tile for creating a Match-6, please feel free to create a new thread in #ideas-feature-requests so that other people can provide feedback & vote for the idea.

As I said, this is not a bug or issue with the game & as such I will be flagging this thread for closure as I don’t think anything productive is coming from the discussion here.

2 Likes

Since this isn’t a bug per se, but rather a potential feature request, this thread will be closed.

As @Guvnor noted above, joining a discussion in #ideas-feature-requests is an appropriate place to continue this discussion.

This thread might be a reasonable starting point: Powerful 7 tile match greater than Diamond?

1 Like