# Wrong Advanced Stone Construction If Combining 6

#stones

Everybody knows, if you combine 4 stones in line, you get a dragon, with 5 a diamond stone.
It works fine, except you are combining 6 (!) stones. This is possible, if the last moved stone fills a line with 4 in one direction, three but in the other. Then you get only the diamond for 5 stones not but the dragon stone for the also created 4-in-line.
I think it is a bug and would be happy having this repaired by E&P Team.
Do you agree?

Erâ€¦ Hummmâ€¦
And if you combine 7 stones (also possible) or sometimes 8,9, 10 or even more during some cascade,
What should we get?

My answer for your post is I think itâ€™s working as intended, and as it should in my opinion.

3 Likes

Sorryâ€¦ Iâ€™m speachlessâ€¦ just plain speachlessâ€¦

2 Likes

A skull would be great, that clears its whole line and column.

3 Likes

@Rfm
Ha ha ha, you never can combine more than 7 stones.
Even with 7 you have a 5 line and a 3 line, first gets a diamond the second nothing as well.

@Ian487
Then why do you waste your valuable time?

You canâ€¦ In a cascadeâ€¦ But nvm

1 Like

@Rfm
You can never combine yourself more than 7 stones, this is we are talking about. Pushing (lifting) cascades does not give anything at all, correctly.
Btw. what is your problem getting a dragon skull more while combining 6 stones? Does it hurt you?

youâ€™re the one who asked
I gave my opinionâ€¦

In cascade combining 5 stones or + give you a diamondâ€¦

1 Like

I would think you canâ€™t use a stone (gem) in more than one construction so youâ€™d get a diamond OR a dragon. The diamond is generally more useful.

Obviously not a bug etc but it would be neat if they introduced some more â€śspecial tilesâ€ť, wouldnâ€™t it

Yes, I have sometimes made a double stack of 3 in a row (six in a rectangle?) which would be cool to get a bonus for.

1 Like

@Rfm
Correct.
If cascades creates valid combinations, they are valid revarded, not (fully) if you do it yourself. This is the bug, I mean.
Lifting cascades will not create crossed combinations like 4vs3, only in line. 7 in line is one diamond, thatâ€™s ok.

In your 4vs3 combo you are using 5 of them to make a diamond. Whatâ€™s left is two gems, not 4.

1 Like

@nevarmaor
A possible explanation, should be confirmed by E&P, I guess.
5 in a hook (cross) a diamond, 4 in-line a dragon, according to my opinion.

@nevarmaor
If you play lotto in combination, you also get all revards even the numbers are â€śusedâ€ť. We are talking about combination rewards.

In that case 5 in a row should be a diamond plus two dragons.

Edit: which I think is ridiculous.

Thatâ€™s great in lotto, but this isnâ€™t lotto. E&P was created to give you the highest possible special tile based on the amount of tiles used. Currently (and maybe always), this is the diamond tile.

Also, this isnâ€™t a bug. This is the way it was made. I think you meant to put this in the Ideas And Features category instead of the Bugs & Issues category. This may be causing part of the confusion.

On another noteâ€¦ yes you can, but only in a cascade. You could technically get 7 tiles of the same color across and then several more going vertical and connecting to your 7.

1 Like

As this game is based on chances we can surely talk about â€ślottoâ€ť.
My son made two draws at Epic and got â€śhero of the monthâ€ť â€” great prize, isnâ€™t it?
Yes, E&P works NOW, like this, it can be but changed, or not?
You tell, we get the highest possible reward and I tell they forgot the 4-in-line combination. Two meanings they are equal and not wrong.
Would you mind if E&P would made this change? If yes, why arguing against?
This I do not understand.
If I would suggest giving free gems for everyone, Iâ€™d surely earn â€śdo not do it, this game is not made like thisâ€ť.

With no cascade you can create more than 7 stones of the same colors. I mean in reality. Of course theoretically you can get four or five vertical stones hitting a hole in te first line, having 2 stones lefts and 2 rights of the same color.
Yeah, if you ever get it, run and buy a lotto immediately.

Just bear in mind I talked but about manual combination opening this thread.

Personally I donâ€™t think we need the extra help of multiple combinations. The player on offence already has enough advantage. Itâ€™s working fine as is.

Plus it would make the Thanos challenge too easy.

2 Likes