The reset at the start of the war makes no sense. It makes the strategy mathematically impossible the way he described it, or highly inefficient.
To keep on with that same example he gave of two alliances with three players each, where the opponent has one strong team and two weak ones:
In hour 1, the alliance uses about 6 flags (2 to kill the strong team, + 2 to kill the two weak teams and reset the field, + 2 more to kill the two weak teams again a second time).
In hour 7 (+6 hours for the first respawn), the alliance uses the remaining 3 flags to kill the two weak teams again.
That means, by this time, the alliance has used ALL 9 flags allotted AND it has to get 7 victories with them to make the strategy work. (First flaw)
In hour 15 (+8 more hours for the second respawn), the alliance uses 3 more flags out of 9 (the replenished war energy), to kill the two weak teams again.
At this point, the alliance is bound to waste the remaining 6 flags because the third respawn will happen after 10 hours, by which time the war has long finished, and Napoleon literally said the strategy is to attack the strong team only once at the beginning of the war. (Second flaw)
You can draw your own conclusion about it as I’m now done with this nonsense. I get the feeling you’re sympathetic towards him and listen, I don’t know ****, he may well be a smart and nice person, but he honestly laid out the dumbest war strategy I’ve ever heard and acted like a Richard about it. Sorry, but like I said, either he has no clue, or he doesn’t know how to describe it.