A number of people have requested that we’d include War Score in the overall Alliance Score. Should we?
Yes
No
0voters
If we did, what should be the formula? Based on a quick look, we could just divide the war score by 6 to keep it approximately in line with the other scores. Better ideas?
So why divide it by 6 and why not just make a separate leaderboard for war scores and show war records in alliance score description or something along those lines.
I guess I’m not understanding the point of including war score in alliance score since i wasnt one of the people requesting it. Is there a thread that brought up this poll?
This subject just seems a bit sudden and out of left field to me. Not sure which thread or posts you read to bring it up at this point in time.
The war score will be just added to the existing alliance score (Cups + Titans).
So the alliancescore itself will not Change the war score or the matchmaking
Having 2 distinct scores help … the matchmaking is getting better… I like the idea of having both on facepage of alliance. Would help people see that it’s not a out of wack matchup
Do not see why would you change that. I believe that current scoring is just fine, so that alliance know how they cope with cups and titans and AW separately since these are separate things… But I like the idea to have both scores on alliance section…
Great point, and one I hadn’t thought of when I voted.
War score does reflect a combination of bench heroes multiplied by a factor based on recent war performance. What if the current alliance score were adjusted by that same war performance factor?
I agree, but the alliance score should reflect both the strength of an alliance and how well they do in wars and against titans to make sense on the leaderboard.
If only the number of aw wins counted it wouldn’t show the strength of the the alliances defeated and that should be a factor if included in alliance score.
I’m still thinking a separate war leaderboard would be a better solution buut idk exactly know how that would be implemented either unless it’s simply based points per win or loss and the higher the war score of opponent, the more points an opponent is worth in the leaderboard record statistic.
Simply meaning an alliance with a war score of 200k beating other 200k opponents and being undefeated isnt the same feat as 400k war score beating other 400k opponents and being undefeated.
Idk alliance score is probably the simplest route i guess
On topic I voted no because I think it will create a bigger gap between alliances. My alliance is under 10k alliance score away from top 100, if everyone above us gains alliance score from wars it seems less achievable. Off topic I’m disappointed that after all the discussion in the forums recently this is what you guys are focusing on. Especially considering you said it doesn’t help war matchups in any way, it’s almost just a cosmetic change…