Hello Warriors!
If your Alliance loses a War, does the amounts of hits used make a difference in who you are matched with in the next War?
Thanks
Hello Warriors!
If your Alliance loses a War, does the amounts of hits used make a difference in who you are matched with in the next War?
Thanks
Not directly, but they do somewhat indirectly.
A small portion of your War Score used for matchmaking is based on your win/loss record.
An alliance that tends to use all of their flags is likely to outperform a similar-strength alliance that consistently leaves many flags unused. So those habits of flag usage are somewhat baked into your track record.
That said, win/loss history is a small component of War Score, which is composed of:
Thanks Zephyr1๐
During the last War, when our opponents went to bed they were 800 ahead, by the time they cane back we were almost 1000 ahead of them. A few came on and fought, but at this point it got odd. They had 60 hits but did not use them. Someone suggested that if they felt they would lose not using their remaining hits would net them a weaker Alliance next War. Iโd have quit an Alliance that left 60 hits at Wars endโ:joy:
Itโs not uncommon to run into alliances that leave a lot of flags unused on a regular basis due to poor planning and low coordination/participation rates.
So it may just be their norm, and not at all a planned strategy.
But in any event, from what we know about War Score, there isnโt evidence that tanking a War radically by a huge loss would impact the history portion of the score notably differently โ if at all โ vs. losing by a single point.
Thanks again Zephyr1, I didnโt think the amount of flags left made a difference. But I promised Iโd ask.