It seems that more and more people are particularly skeptical or unfair about matching their alliance war opponents. Even if you can’t beat the high-level people who have been empathizing for a long time or those who spend a lot of money in the raid that fights individually, we will do our best to raise 6 teams evenly and win together with all the members of the alliance. I want to get good rewards and catch up with strong people! Even if I try my best in the alliance war with that in mind, when I see an opponent who clearly cannot win when the opponent is decided … I will lose motivation for all events and quests besides the war …
If you have been empathizing for a long time and the level is high, the heroes of all 6 teams will grow up, and no matter how hard people below level 30 do, they cannot win. Half of the opponents are level 50 or higher, and in this alliance, only the top two are level 40 or higher … Losing is decided before the fight. Shouldn’t the matching method be improved if this kind of matching occurs?
With the strength of the top 30 players in the current matching criteria and the winning points in the past, the difference with the opponent is too large, so you feel strongly unfair, so why not review the matching criteria?
Suggestion from me
① Maximum power of all allies Total team power of 5 people
② Total level of all allies
③ You can participate in the alliance war with 25 or more allies.
Translated with Google Translator.
Please use english in public forums. Thank you