Please choose one answer from the first two options, and one option from the last three when you vote.
- My latest war was an even match
- My latest war was a landslide for/against my alliance
- I’m happy with the current matching mechanics
- I am indifferent on the change to the matching mechanics
- I’m not satisfied with the current matching mechanics
I’m honestly not sure whether matching based on the titan score will allow for my alliance to continue to enjoy the new feature. Before the change we had gone 2 wins 2 losses, after this change my alliance lost by a meager 76 points. That may not seem like a lot - so to clarify I have a screenshot:
My alliance is a casual group, and because roster strength still isn’t the measure by which matchings are made… our top 5/6 players whom carry our alliance through 5* titan fights only managed to get so far in the war. If matches continue to pit my alliance of casual beginners against teams where participation in the titan fights is the only way they manage - the average score for those you don’t see on that list will continue to be 53 points over six war flags. That kind of result when their teams consistently get wiped out is only going to continue to drop morale - and honestly I didn’t even feel that challenged this war to reach my goal of 300 points for the first time. I grew accustomed to gaining 120ish points over 2 flags against people in my range, however no one in the opposing alliance offered me a chance at more than 86 for a team.
I understand that a simple solution is what the developers are after, however don’t think they realize just how lopsided matching will continue to be off just a single metric. I’m interested in the feedback and felt that perhaps a poll instead of just a hundred threads complaining on the matter may help them see things clearer.
Thanks for your participation and feedback, if nothing else know that I’ll be reading it =)