Should small alliances be disbanded and be required to maintain a min number of players!

[zephyr1]

@zenithciiz thanks for the heads up!

I’m going to leave this separate for now, since it’s a little different than the thread suggesting automatically removing alliances with an inactive leader.

But you’re absolutely right that the OP of each thread have similar reasoning for their posts, despite the difference in suggested solutions:

@RawDawgDirtball

Alliance recruiting has been increasingly tough these days and there are thousands of alliances sitting with 1,2,3 players should they be disbanded to respike player interest and maybe rejoin active alliances.

@Sorsha

you might noticed there is currently a huge problem with alliance recuting. Also I found Topic that someone thinks there are too many alliances.
Before I started my own alliance I had same problem. I was looking for a new alliance and found a huge amount of accounts not beeing visited for over 100 days! I am sure those alliances do not need any new members and should be removed.

Your post that you mentioned was more similar to @Sorsha’s, which made it a more natural fit for merging.

@zenithciiz

This game is alliance based driven and I have been playing for almost a year now with my new fifth alliance that’s really please with overall dynamic of it.

Still I see some pain point of inactive alliance, mostly in discuss is about inactive leader while people in there still keep playing about headless direction and 11 months ago I’m starter this game in this unfavorable situation and think that these group of players and of course potential spenders would deserve better game experience than that.

I’d to see add features of auto disband alliance to alliance that leader gone inactive for 180 days straight so let’s active people find their new home, instead of keep playing motionless day in day out.