No, not exactly. You talk about winning 10 in defense - that is not uncommon at all, particularly with a good defense that is aligned to the tournament type, and also not rare for rush tournies where defense has more of an advantage than say buff booster.
I was talking about winning ALL on offense and ALL on defense which is a world apart from winning 10 in a row in D
Dont misquote me. I said the odds of winning all defense and all offense was astronomically small. I said nothing about winning 10 d in a row, which i have done before too
We do have really differing opinions on a “very average defence” all your defence has emblems, high level troops, 2 of them have no strong colour allowable to be taken against them. Costume Belith is preventing Gunnars split damage being dispelled. This is a very good defence.
An average defence would be no emblems, more limited troops and less synergy between heroes.
Exactly! I think I have a few emblems on maybe 5 3* total, and have exactly ZERO troops that aren’t 4* leveled. And as you said, the specials synergy is also good. That is a very strong defense.
Why do people keep looking for convoluted, nefarious explanations for things. Occams Razor anyone?
You lose all your attacks, you get paired with weaker opponents, thus you win more defenses. Especially with such a strong defense team as that one.
So the Crux of this seems to be that you think that by losing 4 straight on day one the boards of the people attacking your defences are being manipulated so they lose?
I noticed this by accident two weeks ago, thought it strange- repeat- same observation- sadly I didn’t record those, only recorded last week “buff boost” - but again, same conclusion- now recording this real time- my expectation- I will continue to win defenses- as you say, the RNG / boards are being manipulated.
I dont usually enter 3 star tournaments as my hero availability for those is lacking. Next time there is one I will post my results in here for comparison. Expect to see majority of attacks as losses and defence as losses as well.
Example below of team I would have been using if I had entered this tournament. Much more average defence especially given some players use 2 stars in their D
Yep, quite often it’s a case of “no you must be doing this to cause extra work for me, only possible explanation or whoever interviewed you was out of their tree on scooby snacks at the time”
I’m often A rated on defence. Tournament before this I was 5-0 on offence and 3-0 on defence at the end of day 1. But I set a very mean defence so I can imagine it was tough to play against.
So personally I don’t see a coloration between losing on offence and winning on defence.
I feel you need to set a weaker defence next time. Going purple tank, irrespective of who it is, is going to be more of a struggle for any raiders