Thank you all for the effort, but in this way I don’t think we’ll find out what I was interested in. Having the rewards counted at alliance level and then posted here would’ve been better.
Anyway, what I hoped to find out is this:
Are the rewards better for higher ranked alliances? (I.e. if the alliance ranked #5 wins, and also the alliance ranked #5,000 wins, will the members of alliance #5 have better chances for unfarmable ascension materials than the members of the #5,000 alliance?)
How much lower are the odds of the losing alliance compared to the winning alliance? (again, unfarmable mats matter; the rest, for something you’ll get twice a week, is practically junk)
I’m not sure if this has been mentioned already but I’ve been thinking that they might be keeping the loot modest until aw has gone through a few runs and gets tweaked a few times. If the loot was awesome players would really be upset if they feel like they lost out because of unbalanced or misunderstood mechanics (e.g. using 1* heroes on defense). Or maybe that’s wishful thinking…
I’m going to preface this by saying 1) I really like what they’ve done with alliance wars, and 2) I do not ever complain on here about anything, but the winning rewards for AW are really, really bad. For the level of effort we put in to win (110k+ alliances facing off) it was just awful. And it doesn’t have to be ascension mats, boost the epic level tokens and trainer heros way up and it’ll really make a difference. We’re all trying to get higher level guys we can use in this thing.