I’m hesitant to use such provocative hyperbole like “doomed” in any context, let alone this one. What do you mean by “doomed” anyway?
In a game like this, the ebb and flow of heroes in the chart of “best” to “worst” is always going to be in flux, and there’s no meaningful way to fix that without making them all practically identical which would be boring. It sucks when one is stuck with the “worst” hero, objective interpretation or not, but that’s the way things can be sometimes. Full disclosure, I’m sitting here on my high horse with a bunch of amazing heroes (Ares, Seshat, Ranvir, Red Hood, Queen of Hearts, and a few more that really don’t matter to this conversation in question), so you know, not the most objective of posters. But I also have one of the
of
with my
bench led by a max Elkanen… guh, so I get it.
That said, as has been repeated ad infinitum beforehand and likely later, the best hero you have is the one in your roster, and yeah, it sucks when you don’t have the best of the best, but what are YOUR goals with this game, anyway? You don’t need to have a GM-Guin-Seshat-Alaise-MN team to beat the Dark Lord, complete Atlantis, raid, or complete monthly events. The only things that are off limits are the top raid leaderboards and placing in tournaments/monthly events, but those are all about luck and competing with the whaliest of whales to begin with, so one really ought to put things in perspective there.
It’s more about synergy and making the most of what you have. Honestly one of the funnest heroes I’ve had is Richard, who isn’t going to blow anybody’s socks off, but wow is it fun to watch those numbers when you max them out: Ares buffed, Frida/Grimm debuffed, 1200+ damage to the primary target. Overkill? Of course. Satisfying? Definitely.
I’m sorry I’m rambling. What were we on about again?