Awesome sauce! 
I love charts.
Also throwing in my vote for the events to be included as theyāre a big part of the game 
More competitive than raids, in a way. Or at least more profitable to compete in.
Only thing that puzzles me is how on Earth did Elkanen avoid a C mark 
A part of it (and I was only a passing individual who didnāt really contribute anything) is not all of the heros were stringently and completely testedā¦ especially ones that were basically written off by the player base.
Having tried both Elkanen and Kadilen, Kadilen is pretty awesome on raid attack for the same reason Zeline outside of the dispel is still a quality hero. Doesnāt do a lot of damage but that special defense trivializes defender specials.
Iām not sure that was taken into account as hardly anyone levelled her except I figured WTF on the alt and after seeing Zeline figured I could do similarly with Kadilen and lo and behold it worked.
There will probably be some modifications over time and no one is going to take offense if mistakes are found or recommendations for improvement are suggested. Think everyone knew it wasnāt going to be perfect initially and that corrections will be made over time.
Ahahahaha I tried to see the chart and got a message that āthe server is temporarely unavailable due to maintenance or excess overloadāā¦ I am willing to bet it is the second optionā¦everybody must be scrambling (like me 
) to get to it
:: patiently takes her place in the queue to reach the spreadsheet goodness::
Thank you for all the awesome effort you put in the community
Nice work!
Only thing that really jumped out at me was Caedmons rating compared with Petersā, seems a little harsh.
Peters: 641 (x320% special) / 637 / 1105 vs Caedmon: 635 (x345% spec.) / 637 / 1128
While Petersā silencing is brilliant in all situations (and Iām really surprised we havenāt seen more heroes with it yet), itās not crucial to his survivability when faced with 5 opponents and his raw damage output from specials is considerably lower than Caeds. As is the case in many raids, you donāt always get that fast mana off before the enemy charges theirs, and Iām regularly left wishing Iād bought Caedmon instead to clean up where Peters couldnāt do the job. (FU Ares 
)
No doubt Iām nitpicking, but I would put them on the same grade.
Again though, I love the sheet, thank you!
This is amazing guys.
And I honestly agree with almost everything.
If I have to choose just one rating that doesnāt convince me itās HEL. Iād say sheās A+.
But we are really discussing of peanuts.
Great job, definitely.
How is Little Johnās tile damage a B? His attack power is the highest of any 4 star green, is it not?
I thought I fixed that. Thanks for pointing it iut
Thanks for this. I have a tough call on Leonidas as I just got him from a TC20 as my first 5* yellowā¦this helped.
That said, not 100% sold on him. Haha.
There were absolutely fringe heroes that merited b+ or c+
But I stayed true to the Titan grading system to give perspective.
I was very strict with my A+ and I felt in all facts of the game ares and Alby are the only ones that qualify for the overall grade
Guys absolutely contribute anything that you see. It is extremely helpful. If thereās any glaring issues deff let me know, as Zero said this is a very fluid guide that will be changed and moved around as different developments take place.
I would recommend skittleskullās tile damage be raised. He has 13 less than LJ who is an A+ and 14 more than Melendor - looks to be squarely between the two vs. on the same level āBā as Melendor for tile damage. Yes, I like him more than most, but think this is a logical suggestion
I physically cannot bring myself to give skittle any grade higher then a C Even if itās on Merritt:stuck_out_tongue:
So are these just subjective grades?
I updated it. The individual grading is a bit subjective but mostly based on the numbers.
I know, you love him or hate him, no real middle ground on him, haha. I donāt have a 5* green yet so heās my tile damage guy on titans. At he higher levels his attack down feature is also nice.
It looks good and I really do appreciate it being posted, but āa bitā subjective, and āmostlyā, based on the numbers? Do you want to share?
The details of each category are listed on the right of the spreadsheet so you can see which elements are subjective. Something like tiles for e.g is purely based on the attack stats