well I dont think that this will be easy if the matchmaking will get you (as it should be) higher defenses as day passes.
Surely not. But weāre on more or less even footing until a tournament allows 5-stars. Perhaps even better, because us cheapskates tend to use our emblems on 4-stars, rather than trying to powerhouse the 5-stars we donāt have many of.
I totally understand your pov now:
buying your way back in is more like a redemption/second chance thing.
I have 3 x all colors 3* troops at level 10. All those 1 and 2* troops have to go somewhere as I only have a total of 3 x 4* troops.
I think, being used to constantly drive our 4* teams against 5* defenses, we stand a better chance here than most guys used to attack using 5* teams.
But, until we get a better understanding of how the scoring system realy works, itās all a mystery. I won all raids so far within two minutes time, never loosing a hero. I was top 1% when done for today, but now Iām already in the 1-5% range, with chances to drop even further, and nobody seem able to explain why some guys get more points than othersā¦ is it all up to luck? The stronger your match the more points you make? Or do some guys get points already from succesfuly defending?
yup. in the 4* that will come - for me.
Touche! Ai dreptate, but Iām done waitingā¦ Iāve been waiting for eight month now, and my patience is running thinā¦ plus I really need troopsā¦ am I suposed to bring level 1 troops to raid against Guin, Kage and Gravemaker, while feeders gather a layer of dust so thick you may get lost in it?
When 4* troops will dropā¦ You ll have a tough timeā¦ For a long timeā¦
Iām already having a hard time In eight month I never pulled any 5* hero, and from close to 60 TC20 trainings I got Horghall and Kadilen , both unworthy of my tonicsā¦ in my experience raiding agaist 5*, one ot them hits like a baby and the other doesnāt hit at all usuallyā¦ so I keep them both at 2/60, as trophyesā¦ RNG has a twisted sense of humor Beside that, I stopped leveling every 3* troops at 10. So feeders are stacking again alreadyā¦
I think itās quite cool spending wonāt get you to the top tiers. If you spend, that means your record will be 16-4 at best. there will always be enough players going 20-0 or 19-1 each tournament, so I guess if you have to spend, that also means youāre out of the top 5%, maybe even 10%.
Nahh itās not worth it
-
did 15 raids, 15 victories
-
it affect points negatively for some case
Not a chance. Spend gems on broken mechanics? Methinks not.
With the amount of time people devote to making F2P posts, they could open a lemonade stand and earn enough to cover.
Strange things happen to me in that first tournament ( NO ONE ATACK ME) and im in 1-5% so I expect good loot,but who knows, anyway is randomly.
well, i guess people are paying now to get to 1-5%.
i hardly get to make it if i dont use all my 25 flags.
Paying 75 gems to make it into top 1% isnāt a good business considering current rewards.
No way.
Top 1% reward is rubbish.
The board is rubbish.
Raid T was very unsuccessful about design.
Payed every time except 2 raidTs and was rewarded well. Imo it was worth it, since 10 single emblems are sold for 175.
I almost always got at least 10 emblems from tournaments. I also got golden tokens, looties, a reset, some 3* mats and one time only crap.
Would appreciate better loot, but still better than farming.
I disagree. Going from tier 5% to 1% increases your estimated outcome by the following:
0,18 EHT
1 ETT (!)
6,25 emblems
0,25 reset emblem (!)
plus other small stuff.
So if you are more or less certain the rebuy will take you to 1%, I think 75 gems are easily worth it.
I donāt quite understand what do you mean by 1 ETT.
Top 5% - 6% EHT, 10% ETT
Top 1% - 10% EHT, 40% ETT
So the chance for ETT is higher by 30 percent points.