Really liked this phrase a lot. Some heroes that would make the grind of pve a lot less time consuming get nerfed for fears in pvp.
90% of the nerfs are from a pvp standpoint and it’s tough as we need to enjoy pve also and some heroes (lady locke, anzogh) find much better homes in the pve environment rathet than pvp.
The issue become that everyone feels only the top 1% are beta testers and if someone doesnt agree with there nerf you have certain named people, that wanna resort to flaming and name calling.
Francois was not universally agreed o.p. yet there was A LOT that said V.1 was even when people listed tons of different counters for the guy. End result was the largest divide in the community i have ever seen over a single hero and still feel that it left a really nasty taste in the mouth between players.
Malosi hitting three was gonna shake some things up, but nope nerfed back down to 1 person but left very fast so still has potential.
There has to be some give for both sides(pve and pvp) to enjoy themselves and even though pvp sells this game, why are all the top players getting burnt out and retiring if these nerfs are supposed to be healthy to the game.
In the last two months I have seen more fights and breakdowns in the top ranks as people are not happy with the current metas at all as their is very few ways to counter certain heroes and people being forced almost to play one style to have fun, and once you can’t play more than one way, its not fun anymore.