I don’t have beef with@SirGorash nor am I attacking him.
Thank you for re-itteratimg the “because this doesn’t work against me they shouldn’t fix this problem” argument that I did call out in my post though. It’s nice when someone who doesn’t how logic works uses name calling and redirection to prove that they don’t know how logic works.
The “tactic” is called sand bagging and is an emergent behavior present in all aggregate point scoring team games. Every game that wants to remain healthy adjusts their point scoring system to discourage sand bagging whenever it happens, not just when it affects the top one hundred.
I do understand that aggressive attacking heroes and defensive healing heroes are scored on the same system and that hitting auto-fill and setting your team is a recipe for disaster.
They already have an AI system that rates your roster for what its “best team” number should be. They could use this system to rank players within an alliance, assign points to the bottom portion, whatever they test that portion to be. Then sequester those points for those teams and reassign the remaining points among the upper portion of the alliance according to the teams they submit.
I submit this suggestion as a fix for a problem I am watching undfold that I know will be detrimental to the health of the game.
I also understand that sandbaggers will continue to look for other ways to cheat the system.
Now, are you going to name call and redirect or do you want to talk about the problem?
Also, not having an encyclopedic knowledge of the background of every person who could reply is not a counter argument to the point.