Yea I was being sarcastic lol. They were in beta but the feedback about them being too strong was completely ignored and released as is to the game, without even trying to make tweaks to it.
Just people saying these changes should be beta tested do not seem to realize how beta tests turn out
Never understood why they respond to some feedback almost right away (making changes in that very ongoing cycle) but completely ignore others. It doesnât even seem to correlate with how much the point of feedback is linked to revenue. Maybe itâs a bandwidth thing, but frustrating to see.
I didnât like a few things lately, but I accepted them so far more or less. But this?! This is completely ridiculous! Like bunch of kids doing whatever they please without any consequences at all. Incompetent kids to be more precise. Any player of this game with a bit of experience couldâve said those magic hero passives are way too OP. I did a video about it 5 (!) days ago. 5 days! And now 5 days later the stuff bringing their âdataâ again? While - and what is more - they have a beta program. ⌠I got away with not LB-ing cKrampus. Now? Just Limit Broke Motega & CristĂłbal. SG, I honestly believe you donât have lots of shots left.
Tired of leveling heros and limit breaking them to have them nerfed days later. This is what will cause me to burn out on this game. Love the game been playing 3 years but the nerfs have gotten crazy
The story Continues⌠so SG originally creates a Hero Buff that same hero, Nerf that hero again. Why?.
Why do we Have to Keep up with this Bullcrap? We get No compensation for mats weâve used. And yet This continues to happen and us the users End up with a hero that will go down to the bench. And other heroes will arrive with Higher Stats,skills,etc and It will be the same over and over.
Wake up fellas. Your voice its not heard. Your opinion doesnât matter and SG/Zynga only care about $$$$$$. Youâre All smarter than this. Do not spend a penny in this Game enjoy what you have and the friendship youâve created within it. Doesnât matter what the people in beta,forum etc say. It is what theyâve been doing for a long time at lease in my 2.5 years Iâve been playing this Game. Wish everyone luck and Just enjoy what you have. If you want to make an impact and want to be heard donât spend and youâll see what happens. Hurt them deep $$$$$$$.
None of these adjustments would be necessary if the developers were careful in the first place. Beta testers assess these heroes very accurately. Itâs perfectly obvious when a new hero is too strong - the ninjas were the first examples, in my opinion, of needless strength behind a high paywall. But the developers want the money NOW. Theyâll worry about consequences later. (Isnât that true for all of us, really?)
[quote=âSGâ]
Milena in particular quickly became by far the best Hero in the game, and was on the verge of destroying Hero diversity at the top level of play.[/quote]
Nerfed Motega Nadezhda and Anton who needed that buff only because Milena is OP
Great work SGG as always. You are amazing.
Only imagine if 30 people didnât warned you about Milena before. It would be so nice to have beta testers and listen to them right? It would prevent many dissatisfaction.
Iâve always made lot of needed critics but lately⌠SGG my boys⌠You just canât stop giving us reasons to shot on you.
just like how all Christmas heroes got nerfed because krampus costume
and how vela got over nerfed because of telluria
i really thought SG would learn from their mistakes and listen to the feedback but it is becoming really frustrating at this point because there will be no chance of reverts or buffs after nerfs