I am team leader I created a new alliance and opted out of alliance wars I am experienced in wars from the beginning.
I recruited advising we do not war however a new member tried to argue out the point that the individual opt out was to be used not the leader opting the alliance out completely.
They (other alliances) opt into war the team members who want to war to opt in/out this is why they created it. For me as team leader when I say “we do not war” it does not mean you can opt out as individual it means “we do not war”.
War is not our team - we are not heavily committed we hit titans only when logged in we have other responsibilities and this was advised when recruiting + in description - we do not war.
I am a strong believer in team effort in war one player wanting to play and everyone else opting out is not a alliance war its an individual war.
it is my right as team leader to opt all of the alliance out and not provide this option i know my team will not commit to war and I will not pursue it I wont even play cause of responsibilities.
The player left cause I will not opt in, the side effect of this would be one player pushing other players into to committing to war which I will not agree we are not that sort of alliance.
I wanted to share this with those who are team leaders and those who want to war:
- You want to war find a team who does war don’t think all alliances have opted in to war
- Team leaders know your team don’t put them in a difficult situation
- Always read the recruitment ads and description
I have warred and won and lost I know how tough it is.
In the future we may war to see the old battlefield and the infamous bridges we once wanted to set explosives to hinder the other team and all the sneaking around of course and all the mopping up, but this is when we agree we are not a month old yet.