Hello!
How about changing the leader of the alliance?
For example, Leader was not online for 60 days, you can submit an application to take over the alliance in the leader’s profile, and the leader will receive an email if he agrees or not. If there is no answer, the user becomes the new leader of the alliance.
Condition for takeover: User submits the application for takeover, must himself be at least 60 days in the alliance.
Had the following advantages: Dead alliances do not exist, less garbage for your server.
Moin!
Wie wäre es, wenn man den Anführer der Allianz wechseln könnte?
Z.B. Anführer war 60 Tage nicht online, man kann im Profil des Anführers einen Antrag auf Übernahme der Allianz stellen, der Anführer bekommt eine e-Mail, ob er zustimmt oder nicht. Kommt keine Antwort, wird der User der neue Anführer der Allianz.
Bedingung für Übernahme: User der Antrag auf Übernahme stellt, muss selbst mind. 60 Tage in der Allianz sein.
Hätte folgende Vorteile: Tote Allianzen gibt es nicht, weniger Datenmüll für eure Server.
Unless it is a fairly advanced alliance, why not just create a new alliance and have everyone join the new one. The only downside would be the long wait while you climb up through the levels of titans. Early on the wait between titans is fairly long.
Then it is better to the syatem to remove any alliances with inactive 30 days leader.
If the other people want to regroub they can form a new one!
There are tons of no active alliances … some are over a year of inactivaty
If a leader leader is not active for say 60 or 90 days the system should automatically asign that role to either the co-leader or if none to the longest member of that allience.
I agree having to restart everything from scratch sounds annoying and would upset many so letting the system do it makes sense.
The leader was appointed new by the old who left the alliance. In our alliance is the name of an old commander, not new, and here we have the problem the commander is active, the new I am the co-operator, can you change the name of the old for a new leader or not to do it?
Actually how about we have a commander vice commander who has all of the capabilities of the commander and becomes the commander if the commander decides to leave, but but the vice commander can only be 1 other member in the alliance. Ancient, elder, warrior and member should round out the alliance. This gives more members a chance to climb a ladder of the alliance and see where they actually stand.