It made sense to me and I think it’s intended. The only thing that can effect an “undispellable” is if the same hero re-applies the ability to refresh the counter.
Thankfully it goes both ways, if you apply Nat first you can’t overwrite it with Alasie’s weaker debuff.
Only 2 opinions so far: 1 voting for “collateral damage”, 1 for “intended”
I generally use both Nat and Alasie in raid attack, i can say that Alasie is made really awkward when her special is ready before Nat’s (1 out 2 times kinda needless to say).
Can i safely hit that Alby or the hero next to him? Will i regret on next turn when Nat’s special pops out unexpectedly?
Anyone who was in beta and/or can confirm whether or not it has been designed on purpose?