If close to you is them having teams full of capped 5* vs not… Where the extended spawn time makes you attack higher teams.
Again the math says you’re wrong… look at every match you created… All her hundreds of more points in power…
That’s how the game sets power, not me…
So the only example of even you put forth was your own assertion, which was in contrast to every ranking displayed…
If such examples convinced you that you’re correct despite seeing otherwise… so be it…
All the rest is just running at the mouth… I’d rather you had just addressed the actual #’s, that you posted.
@Balusticballsac please read/re-read the forum rules. Many of your recent remarks have been borderline or have crossed the line of forum etiquette. You stated that you wanted to have a serious discussion on your hypothesis. Throwing insults and sarcasm at others is not conducive to a serious discussion.
For your convenience, here is the link to the forum rules:
I’ve re-read through the last 200 posts, and I’m having trouble finding what you’re pointing to? Do you mean where @General_Confusion said “…we have a newb who…”? That’s really more of a designation of inexperience than a dirty name. He was contrasting you with the many experienced players you’ve been arguing with.
And in case you were curious, my latin phrase translates as “people will believe what they want to believe.” It’s certainly not an insult. More of a statement of resignation.
In contrast, you’ve been rude, argumentative, snide and condescending to a wide swath of senior players over the course of this thread. It’s been interesting to watch as one by one, people like @LadySuzanne, @Kerridoc, @General_Confusion, and others tried to help you understand the system, then gave up. I stand by my comment that arguing with you is like arguing with a brick wall.
I called nobody anything and I said Name, not dirty name… and him calling me a noob was meant to be and insult…
just like you’re trying to insult the intelligence of people with that changing of what I said…
How do you know I’m not the senior player? You don’t, and if I call you out on your assumptions that not snide, it’s just a simple display of how easily things are twisted.
What I’ve said and how I’ve responded is there for everyone to read…
Now that we’ve clarified that I’m the senior player… I’ll expect a apology… in both English and Latin.
This is insulting to everyone who had been trying to discuss the subject with you up until that point.
Snide and insulting to someone explaining to you how the system could be gamed.
Calling someone’s comments a “crazy tangent” is actually insulting.
Calling someone silly is an insult. And the whole post is snide and condescending.
Resorting to insulting someone’s spelling instead of debating the merits of their posts is not in any way polite or constructive. You will note no one commented on your spelling or grammar despite the numerous issues.
I promise you there was nothing funny in that post. So to suggest that it shows the posters “[has] a sense of humor” based on it’s content is insulting.
Also sarcastic and insulting.
This is sarcastic, snide, and very dismissive.
This is super sarcastic and insulting. “Sort of like the mind…clearly you can have weak vs. fit.” Suggesting that the person you’re debating has a weak mind is very insulting.
Dismissing a post as just “running at the mouth” is quite insulting.
So your response to my pointing out all the places where you were rude, snide, sarcastic and condescending is to be rude, snide, sarcastic and condescending? I almost don’t know how to reply.
What I will say is, dude, I’m 42 and head up deep neural research at a fortune 100 company. Forum posts don’t hurt my feelings. They do, sometimes, irritate me. Feel free to laugh at me. I simply couldn’t care less.
…so as I was saying earlier, I think it would be possible to assign a points system for different hero abilities, and to use that to make the algorithm even more fair.
I’d also add that it would provide a decent tweaking tool for juicing up the S1 heroes if SGG were so inclined. I’m really confident that such a system would show numerically that the S2, HOTM, event and seasonal heroes tend to overmatch their S1 counterparts by quite a bit.
If there’s any serious chance that SGG would be interested, I’d be happy to take a stab at it, then turn it over to the community to tear apart.
I’m not sure admitting that would be a bad move. Just a couple thoughts off the top of my head:
There have been many things vehemently argued for by the player base. Ex. Posting of summons odds. Once they were posted, the mob mentality ceased. We all know they aren’t created equal…it wouldn’t be a shock and may be appreciated.
Heroes are already shown as not being equal. We have 1-5* heroes. Obviously the 1*s are not equal to the 5’s. Grading them within their star rank wouldn’t be much different.
Not sure those are reason enough for SG to do it, but I’d personally like to see a more granular rating for heroes.